I have read the novel Monk sold his Ferari which describe that when multi billionniare Advocate in England, was looking like 70 years old at the real age of 40. Once he donated all his wealth to trust and gone to Monk Aashram in India.He,even sold his beloved one Ferari to donate Aashram.After one year he saw himself in mirror and found him like 30 years aged one,healthy physically and mentally, but not wealthy.
So please ask question to yourself and reply me.Which one is best option

I think a blanace of the two. What does the advocate do when he has no wealth at all ?! On the other what one does with lots of his wealth if he does not have appropriate health ?! So must be the balance of the two is the correct path. Furthermore, health is more important than wealth because one would be able to gather wealth if he has good health and continue to have good health. vice versa is only worsening situation. One should gather wealth only for the well being of his/her own and others with strict condition of not detoriating ones own health. It is a good topic, thanks.